On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
You really _mustn't_ try to create the pack directly to the
$GIT_DIR/objects/pack subdirectory - that would make git itself start
possibly using that pack before the index is all done, and that
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
You really _mustn't_ try to create the pack directly to the
$GIT_DIR/objects/pack subdirectory - that would make git itself start
possibly using
This series has one patch which is ready to go in and one that's not
(although it's a reasonable phony for the current state of the git world).
1: Several additional functions are needed in the library to support
progressively getting pack data from some remote location and using it
to
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
So I would suggest either:
- droping the packname parameter from git-pack-objects. Make
the packs always named pack-X{40}.pack (or just X{40}.pack);
Well, regardless, we want to be able to specify which directory to write
them to. We
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Well, regardless, we want to be able to specify which directory to write
them to. We don't necessarily want to write them to the current working
directory, nor do we want to write them to their
5 matches
Mail list logo
