On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:34:49AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> 2. We have some unaligned memory accesses that presumably work OK on
> x86, but would blow up on ARM or other platforms (I didn't test).
>
> The latter looks like it's in the untracked cache code (Duy and
> Christian cc'd). Runni
I was playing around with the new-ish "-fsanitize=undefined" compiler
flag, and it detected a few problems:
1. We sometimes bit-shift signed constants too far (fixed by the first
patch).
2. We have some unaligned memory accesses that presumably work OK on
x86, but would blow up on A
2 matches
Mail list logo