On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Paul Tan wrote:
> Hi,
> Okay, I'm trying this out in the next re-roll. I do agree that this
> patch series should not touch anything in t/ at all.
>
> One problem(?) is that putting builtins/pull.o in the BUILTIN_OBJS and
> leaving git-pull.sh in SCRIPT_SH in the M
Hi,
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Paul Tan writes:
>
>> This series rewrites git-pull.sh into a C builtin, thus improving its
>> performance and portability. It is part of my GSoC project to rewrite
>> git-pull
>> and git-am into builtins[2].
>
> Earlier you were worr
Hi Paul,
I already commented on patches 1-10, and I will look in depth at 11-14 tomorrow.
It is a very pleasant read so far. Thank you.
Ciao,
Dscho
P.S.: I have the feeling about patch 12 that reading `opt_rebase` from the
config could be delayed until after we know that the user did not speci
This series directly depends on the changes made in jc/merge and
pt/pull-tests. The commit messages assume that the behavioral changes
proposed in pt/pull-log-n, pt/pull-tags-error-diag, pt/pull-ff-vs-merge-ff,
and [1] have been introduced.
git-pull is a commonly executed command to check for new
4 matches
Mail list logo
