Re: [PATCH 00/43] refs lmdb backend

2015-09-17 Thread Junio C Hamano
David Turner writes: > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 12:01 -0400, David Turner wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:10 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> > >> > [03/43] seems to be missing >> >> I just attempted to re-send it, but I still don't see it on gmane. >> Perhaps this is

Re: [PATCH 00/43] refs lmdb backend

2015-09-16 Thread David Turner
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 12:01 -0400, David Turner wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:10 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > David Turner writes: > > > > > I think I've broken about all of the standalone stuff out, so here's > > > the main enchilada. > > > > > > This series

Re: [PATCH 00/43] refs lmdb backend

2015-09-04 Thread David Turner
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:10 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > David Turner writes: > > > I think I've broken about all of the standalone stuff out, so here's > > the main enchilada. > > > > This series depends on at least the following topics in pu: > > dt/refs-bisection >

Re: [PATCH 00/43] refs lmdb backend

2015-09-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
David Turner writes: > I think I've broken about all of the standalone stuff out, so here's > the main enchilada. > > This series depends on at least the following topics in pu: > dt/refs-bisection > dt/refs-pseudo > dt/reflog-tests > kn/for-each-tag (patch 21 and

[PATCH 00/43] refs lmdb backend

2015-09-02 Thread David Turner
I think I've broken about all of the standalone stuff out, so here's the main enchilada. This series depends on at least the following topics in pu: dt/refs-bisection dt/refs-pseudo dt/reflog-tests kn/for-each-tag (patch 21 and corresponding bits of 42 depend on this; we could skip them, but I