Hi Junio,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] Introduce fsck options
please make it easier to cluster and spot the series in the eventual
shortlog by giving a common prefix to the patches, e.g
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
Is it a good idea to allow walker to be strict but obj verifier to
be not (or vice versa)? I am wondering why this is not a single
struct with two callback function pointers.
Unfortunately not. There are two different walkers used, and
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
THis is not limited to this step, but
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] Introduce fsck options
please make it easier to cluster and spot the series in the eventual
shortlog by giving a common prefix to the patches, e.g.
fsck: introduce
Just like the diff machinery, we are about to introduce more settings,
therefore it makes sense to carry them around as a (pointer to a) struct
containing all of them.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de
---
builtin/fsck.c | 20 +--
builtin/index-pack.c
4 matches
Mail list logo