On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:48:14PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
By default, a patch that affects outside the working area is
rejected as a mistake; Git itself never creates such a patch
unless the user bends backwards and specifies nonstandard
prefix to git diff and friends.
When `git
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
It looks like your new --allow-uplevel goes to verify_path(). So this
isn't just about .., but it will also protect against applying a patch
inside .git. Which seems like a good thing to me, but I wonder if the
option name is a little misleading.
True; not
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:07:34AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
It looks like your new --allow-uplevel goes to verify_path(). So this
isn't just about .., but it will also protect against applying a patch
inside .git. Which seems like a good thing to me,
By default, a patch that affects outside the working area is
rejected as a mistake; Git itself never creates such a patch
unless the user bends backwards and specifies nonstandard
prefix to git diff and friends.
When `git apply` is used without either `--index` or `--cached`
option as a better
4 matches
Mail list logo