Duy Nguyen writes:
> Thank you for catching this. I was about to write "would be nice to
> point out what tests fail so the reviewer has easier time trying
> themselves", but whoa.. quite a few of them!
>
> May I suggest a slight modification. Even though stage info is messed
> up before the inde
On 03/24, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> > The split index extension uses ewah bitmaps to mark index entries as
> > deleted, instead of removing them from the index directly. This can
> > result in an on-disk index, in which entries of stage #0 and h
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> The split index extension uses ewah bitmaps to mark index entries as
> deleted, instead of removing them from the index directly. This can
> result in an on-disk index, in which entries of stage #0 and higher
> stages appear, which are rem
The split index extension uses ewah bitmaps to mark index entries as
deleted, instead of removing them from the index directly. This can
result in an on-disk index, in which entries of stage #0 and higher
stages appear, which are removed later when the index bases are merged.
15999d0 read_index_f
4 matches
Mail list logo
