Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com
wrote:
From: Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com
Modify logic of check_refname_component and add a new disposition
regarding *. Allow refspecs that contain a single * if
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 15:12 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Jacob Keller
jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
From: Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com
Modify logic of check_refname_component and add a new
Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes:
s/hangled/handled/
...
Thanks; here is what I queued yesterday.
Woah. I bow to your imperative commit message abilities. The new commit
message is very nicely worded.
Heh, imperative is secondary. I just wanted to straighten out the
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
From: Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com
Modify logic of check_refname_component and add a new disposition
regarding *. Allow refspecs that contain a single * if
REFNAME_REFSPEC_PATTERN is set. Change the function
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Will squash the changes; no need to resend (unless people discover
other issues; let's hope that I wouldn't be the one to do so ;-).
Thanks.
diff --git i/t/t5511-refspec.sh w/t/t5511-refspec.sh
index de6db86ccff0..7bfca7962d41 100755
---
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
That was whitespace damaged, so I had to hand-tweak the file in
place. While at it, I noticed that we do not check a case where
multiple asterisks appear in a single component (which is rejected
for a reason different
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com writes:
By the way, have you run test suite before sending this (or any
previous round of this) patch? This seems to break t5511-refspec.sh
for me.
Looks like another location I
Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com writes:
By the way, have you run test suite before sending this (or any
previous round of this) patch? This seems to break t5511-refspec.sh
for me.
Looks like another location I forgot to update. I can send a re-spin
if you need with the following diff.
Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes:
From: Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com
Modify logic of check_refname_component and add a new disposition
regarding *. Allow refspecs that contain a single * if
REFNAME_REFSPEC_PATTERN is set. Change the function to pass the flags as
a
From: Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com
Modify logic of check_refname_component and add a new disposition
regarding *. Allow refspecs that contain a single * if
REFNAME_REFSPEC_PATTERN is set. Change the function to pass the flags as
a pointer, and clear REFNAME_REFSPEC_PATTERN after the first
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes:
From: Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com
Modify logic of check_refname_component and add a new disposition
regarding *. Allow refspecs that contain a single * if
11 matches
Mail list logo
