On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:40:12AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > There's discussion elsewhere[1] of applying just up to patch 2.
> >
> > Do we still want to convert these cases to die() as their end-state?
>
> IMHO yes, we do. die() is the function that you can use to exit with
> a fatal err
Hi,
Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 03:59:47PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:54:16PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> A value of -1 returned from cmd_gc gets propagated to exit(),
>>> resulting in an exit status of 255. Use die instead for a clearer
>>> error
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 03:59:47PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:54:16PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> > A value of -1 returned from cmd_gc gets propagated to exit(),
> > resulting in an exit status of 255. Use die instead for a clearer
> > error message and a controll
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:54:16PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> A value of -1 returned from cmd_gc gets propagated to exit(),
> resulting in an exit status of 255. Use die instead for a clearer
> error message and a controlled exit.
This feels a little funny because we know we're going to tur
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> A value of -1 returned from cmd_gc gets propagated to exit(),
> resulting in an exit status of 255. Use die instead for a clearer
> error message and a controlled exit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder
> ---
> As in
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20180716225639.gk11.
A value of -1 returned from cmd_gc gets propagated to exit(),
resulting in an exit status of 255. Use die instead for a clearer
error message and a controlled exit.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder
---
As in
https://public-inbox.org/git/20180716225639.gk11...@aiede.svl.corp.google.com/.
The only c
6 matches
Mail list logo