Hi Hannes,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 27.04.2016 um 08:43 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > > Should we insert a check for MAP_PRIVATE to catch
> > > unexpected use-cases (think of the index-helper daemon effort)?
> >
> > I agree, w
Am 27.04.2016 um 08:43 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Should we insert a check for MAP_PRIVATE to catch
unexpected use-cases (think of the index-helper daemon effort)?
I agree, we should have such a check. The line above the `die("Invalid
usage ...")` th
Hi Hannes,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 22.04.2016 um 16:31 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> > Often we are mmap()ing read-only. In those cases, it is wasteful to map in
> > copy-on-write mode. Even worse: it can cause errors where we run out of
> > space in the page file.
> >
> >
Am 22.04.2016 um 16:31 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
Often we are mmap()ing read-only. In those cases, it is wasteful to map in
copy-on-write mode. Even worse: it can cause errors where we run out of
space in the page file.
So let's be extra careful to map files in read-only mode whenever
possibl
Often we are mmap()ing read-only. In those cases, it is wasteful to map in
copy-on-write mode. Even worse: it can cause errors where we run out of
space in the page file.
So let's be extra careful to map files in read-only mode whenever
possible.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
compat/wi
5 matches
Mail list logo