On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:25:24AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > However, this does make things more consistent with upload-pack, which
> > connects the stderr of pack-objects to sideband (which it must to handle
> > progress). Furthermore, many of the messages from receive-pack are
> > handled
Jeff King writes:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:49:40AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > 2. No matter what the cause, we are probably better off
>> > showing the errors to the client. If the client and the
>> > server admin are not the same entity, it is probably
>> > much easi
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:49:40AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > 2. No matter what the cause, we are probably better off
> > showing the errors to the client. If the client and the
> > server admin are not the same entity, it is probably
> > much easier for the client to cut-an
Jeff King writes:
> Receive-pack invokes either unpack-objects or index-pack to
> handle the incoming pack. However, we do not redirect the
> stderr of the sub-processes at all, so it is never seen by
> the client. From the initial thread adding sideband support,
> which is here:
>
> http://thr
Receive-pack invokes either unpack-objects or index-pack to
handle the incoming pack. However, we do not redirect the
stderr of the sub-processes at all, so it is never seen by
the client. From the initial thread adding sideband support,
which is here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-
5 matches
Mail list logo
