When we allocate the test_entry flex-struct, we have to add
up all of the elements that go into the flex array. If these
were to overflow a size_t, this would allocate a too-small
buffer, which we would then overflow in our memcpy steps.
Since this is just a test-helper, it probably doesn't matter
in practice, but we should model the correct technique by
using the st_add() macros.
Unfortunately, we cannot use the FLEX_ALLOC() macros here,
because we are stuffing two different buffers into a single
flex array.
While we're here, let's also swap out "malloc" for our
error-checking "xmalloc", and use the preferred
"sizeof(*var)" instead of "sizeof(type)".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
---
t/helper/test-hashmap.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/helper/test-hashmap.c b/t/helper/test-hashmap.c
index b36886bf35..2100877c2b 100644
--- a/t/helper/test-hashmap.c
+++ b/t/helper/test-hashmap.c
@@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ static int test_entry_cmp(const void *cmp_data,
static struct test_entry *alloc_test_entry(int hash, char *key, int klen,
char *value, int vlen)
{
- struct test_entry *entry = malloc(sizeof(struct test_entry) + klen
- + vlen + 2);
+ struct test_entry *entry = xmalloc(st_add4(sizeof(*entry), klen, vlen,
2));
hashmap_entry_init(entry, hash);
memcpy(entry->key, key, klen + 1);
memcpy(entry->key + klen + 1, value, vlen + 1);
--
2.16.1.464.gc4bae515b7
