From: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
In the tests involving @{-1} and @{u} as the final component, what we
really want to check is if it's pointing to the right ref. We
currently check the tip commit of the ref, but we can clarify this by
separating out checking for commits versus
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
In the tests involving @{-1} and @{u} as the final component, what we
really want to check is if it's pointing to the right ref. We
currently check the tip commit
Felipe Contreras wrote:
I'm not sure about this. If we introduce a check that fails, we would
have to do:
check HEAD refs/heads/new-branch failure
Which doesn't seem clean. Perhaps it makes more sense to always add
the type of check:
check HEAD ref refs/heads/new-branch
I think you
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
artag...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
I'm not sure about this. If we introduce a check that fails, we would
have to do:
check HEAD refs/heads/new-branch failure
Which doesn't seem clean. Perhaps it makes more sense to always
4 matches
Mail list logo