On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:09:33PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > This actually drops the last caller for for_each_branch_ref(). I'm not
> > sure if we shoulder consider cleaning up the proliferation of
> > for_each_ref() helpers.
>
> That is certainly a good thing to do
Jeff King writes:
> This actually drops the last caller for for_each_branch_ref(). I'm not
> sure if we shoulder consider cleaning up the proliferation of
> for_each_ref() helpers.
That is certainly a good thing to do (but outside this series).
I am wondering if "git diff" could have chosen a b
All of these options do the same thing "--foo" iterates over
the "foo" refs, and "--foo=" does the same with a
glob. We can factor this into its own function to avoid
repeating ourselves.
There are two subtleties to note:
- the original called for_each_branch_ref(), etc, in the
non-glob cas
3 matches
Mail list logo