Stefan Beller writes:
>> So I think this patch is insufficient, and needs to at least change
>> the "submodule.active" codepath to return !!ret; otherwise, a caller
>> that now expects 0 (not active), 1 (active but can lose URL) and 2
>> (active and the presence of URL makes it so) will be
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:37 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
> > The change a086f921a72 (submodule: decouple url and submodule interest,
> > 2017-03-17) enables us to do more than originally thought.
> > As the url setting was used both to actually set the url where to
> >
Stefan Beller writes:
> The change a086f921a72 (submodule: decouple url and submodule interest,
> 2017-03-17) enables us to do more than originally thought.
> As the url setting was used both to actually set the url where to
> obtain the submodule from, as well as used as a boolean flag later
>
The change a086f921a72 (submodule: decouple url and submodule interest,
2017-03-17) enables us to do more than originally thought.
As the url setting was used both to actually set the url where to
obtain the submodule from, as well as used as a boolean flag later
to see if it was active, we would
4 matches
Mail list logo
