Hi Tomas,
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> On 02/17, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/t/t5505-remote.sh b/t/t5505-remote.sh
> > index 94079a0..19e8e34 100755
> > --- a/t/t5505-remote.sh
> > +++ b/t/t5505-remote.sh
> > @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ test_expect_success setup '
> >
On 02/17, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Peff & Thomas,
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Jeff King wrote:
> > This original is quite confusing. I thought at first that there was
> > perhaps something going on with allowing repeated re-configuration of
> > the same remote, as long as some parameters
Hi Peff & Thomas,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 06:42:30PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> > Both remote add and remote rename use a slightly different hand-rolled
> > check if the remote exits. The hand-rolled check may have some subtle
> > cases in which
On 02/15, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 06:42:30PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> > Both remote add and remote rename use a slightly different hand-rolled
> > check if the remote exits. The hand-rolled check may have some subtle
> > cases in which it might fail to detect when a
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 06:42:30PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> Both remote add and remote rename use a slightly different hand-rolled
> check if the remote exits. The hand-rolled check may have some subtle
> cases in which it might fail to detect when a remote already exists.
> One such case
Both remote add and remote rename use a slightly different hand-rolled
check if the remote exits. The hand-rolled check may have some subtle
cases in which it might fail to detect when a remote already exists.
One such case was fixed in fb86e32 ("git remote: allow adding remotes
agreeing with
6 matches
Mail list logo
