Junio C Hamano writes:
> Thanks for working on this. Perhaps the last paragraph can be like
> this?
>
> Merging inside a <> will work
> as long as a merge base is found in the resent history.
> Otherwise, it will be like merging unrelated histories and may
> have to result in hug
Stephen & Linda Smith writes:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 11:24:00 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> "Stephen P. Smith" writes:
>>
>> > Rather than merely pointing readers at the 1.5 release notes to
>> > learn about shallow clones, document them formally.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smit
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 11:24:00 AM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Stephen P. Smith" writes:
>
> > Rather than merely pointing readers at the 1.5 release notes to
> > learn about shallow clones, document them formally.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smith
> > ---
>
> Thanks. I do not think
"Stephen P. Smith" writes:
> Rather than merely pointing readers at the 1.5 release notes to
> learn about shallow clones, document them formally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smith
> ---
Thanks. I do not think the reference to RelNotes were meant for the
end-user readers, though. That was a
Rather than merely pointing readers at the 1.5 release notes to
learn about shallow clones, document them formally.
Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smith
---
Notes:
Added a paragraph about the fundamental limitation with merging
histories that do not have a merge base in the shallow repository
5 matches
Mail list logo
