Re: [PATCH v10 00/20] index-helper/watchman

2016-05-19 Thread David Turner
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 13:11 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > David Turner writes: > > > Do folks have any more comments on this version? > > Not from me at the moment. > > > Do I need to re-roll > > to replace 11/20 as I proposed and drop 20/20? > > FYI, I think I

Re: [PATCH v10 00/20] index-helper/watchman

2016-05-19 Thread Junio C Hamano
David Turner writes: > Do folks have any more comments on this version? Not from me at the moment. > Do I need to re-roll > to replace 11/20 as I proposed and drop 20/20? FYI, I think I have the one taken from Message-Id:

Re: [PATCH v10 00/20] index-helper/watchman

2016-05-19 Thread David Turner
Do folks have any more comments on this version? Do I need to re-roll to replace 11/20 as I proposed and drop 20/20? Thanks. On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 16:19 -0400, David Turner wrote: > packet_write was causing the sigpipes (by calling write_or_die, which > intentionally overrides the caller's

Re: [PATCH v10 00/20] index-helper/watchman

2016-05-14 Thread Dennis Kaarsemaker
On do, 2016-05-12 at 16:19 -0400, David Turner wrote: > This version fixes that.  I didn't test on a virtual machine, but I > did test by adding a sleep(). I can confirm that on my single-cpu test VM, this no longer triggers errors. D. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[PATCH v10 00/20] index-helper/watchman

2016-05-12 Thread David Turner
packet_write was causing the sigpipes (by calling write_or_die, which intentionally overrides the caller's preferences about signal handling). This version fixes that. I didn't test on a virtual machine, but I did test by adding a sleep(). David Turner (9): pkt-line: add gentle version of