On 10/16, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> > 2: 63f2e0e6f9 ! 2: 2d45985676 strbuf.c: add `strbuf_join_argv()`
> > @@ -14,19 +14,17 @@
> > strbuf_setlen(sb, sb->len + sb2->len);
> > }
> >
> > -+const
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> 2: 63f2e0e6f9 ! 2: 2d45985676 strbuf.c: add `strbuf_join_argv()`
> @@ -14,19 +14,17 @@
> strbuf_setlen(sb, sb->len + sb2->len);
> }
>
> -+const char *strbuf_join_argv(struct strbuf *buf,
> -+
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> On 10/15, Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is a new iteration of `git stash`, based on the last review.
>> This iteration fixes some code styling issues, bring some changes
>> to `do_push_stash()` and `do_create_stash()` to be closer to API by
>>
On 10/15, Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a new iteration of `git stash`, based on the last review.
> This iteration fixes some code styling issues, bring some changes
> to `do_push_stash()` and `do_create_stash()` to be closer to API by
> following Thomas Gummerer's review
Hello,
This is a new iteration of `git stash`, based on the last review.
This iteration fixes some code styling issues, bring some changes
to `do_push_stash()` and `do_create_stash()` to be closer to API by
following Thomas Gummerer's review of last iteration [1]. Also, there
were some missing
5 matches
Mail list logo