On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
accommodate completion of thin packs.
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
accommodate completion of thin packs. Given that the main SHA1 table is
now in the main pack file, it should
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
accommodate completion of thin packs. Given that the main SHA1 table is
now in the main pack file, it should be possible to still carry a small
SHA1
Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
accommodate completion of thin packs. Given that the main SHA1 table
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
accommodate
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
Now the pack index v3 probably needs to be improved a little, again to
accommodate completion of thin packs. Given that the main SHA1 table is
now in the
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
So... looks like pack v4 is now functional.
However something is still wrong as it operates about 6 times slower
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
Many other bugs have now been fixed. A git.git repository with packs
version 4 appears to be functional and passes git-fsck --full --strict.
Yeah I was looking at the diff some minutes ago, saw changes in
pack-check.c and
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
Many other bugs have now been fixed. A git.git repository with packs
version 4 appears to be functional and passes git-fsck --full --strict.
Yeah I was looking at the diff some
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
Many other bugs have now been fixed. A git.git repository with packs
version 4 appears to be functional and
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
---
Incorporated suggestions by Nico and Junio. I went ahead and added
escape hatches for converting thin packs to full ones so the document
does not really match the code (I've been
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
---
Incorporated suggestions by Nico and Junio. I went ahead and added
escape hatches for converting thin packs to full ones so the
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
So... looks like pack v4 is now functional.
However something is still wrong as it operates about 6 times slower
than pack v3.
Anyone wishes to investigate?
You recurse in decode_entries too deep.I check the first 1
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net wrote:
So... looks like pack v4 is now functional.
However something is still wrong as it operates about 6 times slower
than pack v3.
Anyone wishes to
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
---
Incorporated suggestions by Nico and Junio. I went ahead and added
escape hatches for converting thin packs to full ones so the document
does not really match the code (I've been watching Nico's repository,
commit reading is added,
15 matches
Mail list logo
