These slightly improve the reading flow by making it obvious that a list
follows.

Also, make the wording of both headings consistent by changing "contains
%d ref(s)" to "contains this ref"/"contains these %d refs".

Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer <g...@cryptocrack.de>
---
 bundle.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
index 65db53b..6210a6b 100644
--- a/bundle.c
+++ b/bundle.c
@@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ int verify_bundle(struct bundle_header *header, int verbose)
                struct ref_list *r;
 
                r = &header->references;
-               printf_ln(Q_("The bundle contains %d ref",
-                            "The bundle contains %d refs",
+               printf_ln(Q_("The bundle contains this ref:",
+                            "The bundle contains these %d refs:",
                             r->nr),
                          r->nr);
                list_refs(r, 0, NULL);
@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ int verify_bundle(struct bundle_header *header, int verbose)
                if (!r->nr) {
                        printf_ln(_("The bundle records a complete history."));
                } else {
-                       printf_ln(Q_("The bundle requires this ref",
-                                    "The bundle requires these %d refs",
+                       printf_ln(Q_("The bundle requires this ref:",
+                                    "The bundle requires these %d refs:",
                                     r->nr),
                                  r->nr);
                        list_refs(r, 0, NULL);
-- 
1.8.2.rc2.352.g908df73

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to