On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>> This sounds like a good thing to do. Perhaps the refspec mapping
>>> can be handled the same way as a backend feature so that you do not
>>> have
Felipe Contreras writes:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> This sounds like a good thing to do. Perhaps the refspec mapping
>> can be handled the same way as a backend feature so that you do not
>> have to unconditionally disable it in the other patch.
>
> With my p
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> Certain remote-helpers (the ones with 'export') would try to push
>> regardless.
>>
>> Obviously this is not what the user wants.
>>
>> Also, add a check for the 'dry-run' option, so remote-helpers can
>> impl
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Certain remote-helpers (the ones with 'export') would try to push
> regardless.
>
> Obviously this is not what the user wants.
>
> Also, add a check for the 'dry-run' option, so remote-helpers can
> implement it.
This sounds like a good thing to do. Perhaps the refspe
Certain remote-helpers (the ones with 'export') would try to push
regardless.
Obviously this is not what the user wants.
Also, add a check for the 'dry-run' option, so remote-helpers can
implement it.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
---
transport-helper.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertion
5 matches
Mail list logo