On 03/09, Valery Tolstov wrote:
> > The usual protocol would be to rebase off of Stefan's series and build
> > on that (assuming you have a dependency against his series), indicating
> > that you are doing as such in your cover letter.
>
> So, should I send only my patch, or current format (patch
> The usual protocol would be to rebase off of Stefan's series and build
> on that (assuming you have a dependency against his series), indicating
> that you are doing as such in your cover letter.
So, should I send only my patch, or current format (patch and dependency)
is acceptalbe?
Regards,
On 03/09, Valery Tolstov wrote:
> > Then the next step (as outlined by Documentation/SubmittingPatches)
> > is to figure out how to best present this to the mailing list; I think the
> > best
> > way is to send out a patch series consisting of both of these 2 patches,
> > the
> Then the next step (as outlined by Documentation/SubmittingPatches)
> is to figure out how to best present this to the mailing list; I think the
> best
> way is to send out a patch series consisting of both of these 2 patches,
> the "connect_work_tree_and_git_dir: safely create leading
4 matches
Mail list logo