On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:13:56PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
>> > I'm not clear on what you are suggesting. That we protect only the main
>> > thread from recursion, or that we drop the check entirely? Or that we
>> > implement thread-local s
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 05:49:41PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jeff King wrote:
>
> > [1/2]: usage: allow pluggable die-recursion checks
> > [2/2]: run-command: use thread-aware die_is_recursing routine
>
> Lovely. This doesn't solve the analagous problem for grep,
> index-pack, pack-ob
Jeff King wrote:
> [1/2]: usage: allow pluggable die-recursion checks
> [2/2]: run-command: use thread-aware die_is_recursing routine
Lovely. This doesn't solve the analagous problem for grep,
index-pack, pack-objects, preload-index, or bidirectional_transfer_loop,
but it doesn't make them w
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:13:56PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > I'm not clear on what you are suggesting. That we protect only the main
> > thread from recursion, or that we drop the check entirely? Or that we
> > implement thread-local storage for this case without using pthread_once?
>
> Any
4 matches
Mail list logo