Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

Hi Junio, On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I really want to see that the runtime prefix stuff mature enough during > this cycle, so these follow-up patches are all very much appreciated. FWIW I merged these patches (including my touch-ups) into Git for Windows' `master` branch

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

Johannes Schindelin writes: > Thank you, and sorry for the trouble. I am just too used to a Continuous > Integration setting with exactly one integration branch. Fixing problems close to the source (i.e. picking an appropriately aged base) and making sure everthing

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

Hi Junio, On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > >>> base-commit: b46fe60e1d7235603a29499822493bd3791195da > >> > >> Basing your work on the tip of 'next' is good for discussion, but > >> not

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

Junio C Hamano writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >>> base-commit: b46fe60e1d7235603a29499822493bd3791195da >> >> Basing your work on the tip of 'next' is good for discussion, but >> not readily usable for final application. Let me see if I can >> untangle

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

Junio C Hamano writes: >> base-commit: b46fe60e1d7235603a29499822493bd3791195da > > Basing your work on the tip of 'next' is good for discussion, but > not readily usable for final application. Let me see if I can > untangle the dependents to come up with a reasonable base.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

Johannes Schindelin writes: > We carried a slightly different version of the git_setup_gettext() patch > (which took care of releasing the buffer allocated by system_path()), > and we carry two more patches that touch the same area, so now that > dj/runtime-prefix hit

[PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

We carried a slightly different version of the git_setup_gettext() patch (which took care of releasing the buffer allocated by system_path()), and we carry two more patches that touch the same area, so now that dj/runtime-prefix hit `next`, it seems a good time to contribute those, too. Changes