Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] user-manual: Update for receive.denyCurrentBranch=refuse

2013-02-18 Thread Junio C Hamano
Drew Northup writes: > This looks safe to me, with the minor nit that "ofthe" ("of the") > isn't one word. Thanks; typo corrected. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.or

Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] user-manual: Update for receive.denyCurrentBranch=refuse

2013-02-18 Thread Drew Northup
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I did not think the detailed discussion belongs there in the first > place, so I re-read the context. I think the only thing the reader > of the user manual needs to learn at that point of the flow is that > they can push to a non-bare but

Re: [git] Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] user-manual: Update for receive.denyCurrentBranch=refuse

2013-02-17 Thread W. Trevor King
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:57:21AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > So let's tone everything down and do this instead: > > -- >8 -- > From: "W. Trevor King" > Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:04:20 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] user-manual: Update for receive.denyCurrentBranch=refuse > > acd2a45 (Refuse updati

Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] user-manual: Update for receive.denyCurrentBranch=refuse

2013-02-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > "W. Trevor King" writes: > >> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:24:47PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> I would not be surprised if some readers felt as if "then why not >>> update it instead of rejecting?" were a valid question, without a >>> bit more explanation. >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] user-manual: Update for receive.denyCurrentBranch=refuse

2013-02-10 Thread Junio C Hamano
"W. Trevor King" writes: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:24:47PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I would not be surprised if some readers felt as if "then why not >> update it instead of rejecting?" were a valid question, without a >> bit more explanation. >> >> You can also push to a repositor

Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] user-manual: Update for receive.denyCurrentBranch=refuse

2013-02-10 Thread W. Trevor King
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:24:47PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I would not be surprised if some readers felt as if "then why not > update it instead of rejecting?" were a valid question, without a > bit more explanation. > > You can also push to a repository that has a working tree, > …

Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] user-manual: Update for receive.denyCurrentBranch=refuse

2013-02-10 Thread Junio C Hamano
"W. Trevor King" writes: > From: "W. Trevor King" > > acd2a45 (Refuse updating the current branch in a non-bare repository > via push, 2009-02-11) changed the default to refuse such a push, but > it forgot to update the docs. > > 7d182f5 (Documentation: receive.denyCurrentBranch defaults to > 'r

[PATCH v2 02/15] user-manual: Update for receive.denyCurrentBranch=refuse

2013-02-10 Thread W. Trevor King
From: "W. Trevor King" acd2a45 (Refuse updating the current branch in a non-bare repository via push, 2009-02-11) changed the default to refuse such a push, but it forgot to update the docs. 7d182f5 (Documentation: receive.denyCurrentBranch defaults to 'refuse', 2010-03-17) updated Documentation