Amend the section which describes how the first line of the subject should look like to say that the ":" in "area: " shouldn't be treated like a full stop for the purposes of letter casing.
Change the two subject examples to make this new paragraph clearer, i.e. "unstar" is not a common word, and "git-cherry-pick.txt" is a much longer string than "githooks.txt". Pick two recent commits from git.git that fit better for the description. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> --- Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches index 3faf7eb884..9ef624ce38 100644 --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches @@ -98,12 +98,17 @@ should skip the full stop. It is also conventional in most cases to prefix the first line with "area: " where the area is a filename or identifier for the general area of the code being modified, e.g. - . archive: ustar header checksum is computed unsigned - . git-cherry-pick.txt: clarify the use of revision range notation + . doc: clarify distinction between sign-off and pgp-signing + . githooks.txt: improve the intro section If in doubt which identifier to use, run "git log --no-merges" on the files you are modifying to see the current conventions. +It's customary to start the remainder of the first line after "area: " +with a lower-case letter. E.g. "doc: clarify...", not "doc: +Clarify...", or "githooks.txt: improve...", not "githooks.txt: +Improve...". + The body should provide a meaningful commit message, which: . explains the problem the change tries to solve, iow, what is wrong -- 2.11.0
