On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
I think there are two cases that we need to consider:
1. We have a full repo and somebody requests a shallow clone for us.
We probably do not want to use bitmaps here. In the series we have
been testing, shallow
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:25:14PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
For bitmaps to be used, the following must be true:
1. We must be packing to stdout (as a normal `pack-objects` from
`upload-pack` would do).
2. There must be a .bitmap index containing at least one of the
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:25:14PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
For bitmaps to be used, the following must be true:
1. We must be packing to stdout (as a normal `pack-objects` from
`upload-pack` would do).
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 05:28:08PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
One other criterion I should have mentioned: we must be using the
internal rev-list. That prevented us in v1.8.4.1 and earlier from using
bitmaps for shallow fetches. But as of v1.8.4.2, we always use
pack-objects'
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
From: Vicent Marti tan...@gmail.com
In this patch, we use the bitmap API to perform the `Counting Objects`
phase in pack-objects, rather than a traditional walk through the object
graph. For a reasonably-packed large repo, the
From: Vicent Marti tan...@gmail.com
In this patch, we use the bitmap API to perform the `Counting Objects`
phase in pack-objects, rather than a traditional walk through the object
graph. For a reasonably-packed large repo, the time to fetch and clone
is often dominated by the full-object revision
6 matches
Mail list logo
