Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] config doc: mention future aspirations for transfer.fsckObjects

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > Jeff King has said on at least a couple of occasions (at least one of > Let's note that in the documentation so we don't seem to be claiming > that this is by design. A previous version of this change called the

[PATCH v2 4/5] config doc: mention future aspirations for transfer.fsckObjects

Jeff King has said on at least a couple of occasions (at least one of which may have been in person over beer) that leaving corrupt objects in the local object store after a "fetch" that fails transfer.fsckObjects should be fixed, and we should have something like the server-side quarantine