Michał Górny writes:
>> OK, so the whole thing makes sense to me.
>>
>> Having said that, if we wanted to short-circuit, I think
>>
>> for (each line) {
>> for (each sigcheck_gpg_status[]) {
>> if (not the one on line)
>>
On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 12:31 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michał Górny writes:
>
> > GnuPG supports creating signatures consisting of multiple signature
> > packets. If such a signature is verified, it outputs all the status
> > messages for each signature separately. However, git currently
Michał Górny writes:
> GnuPG supports creating signatures consisting of multiple signature
> packets. If such a signature is verified, it outputs all the status
> messages for each signature separately. However, git currently does not
> account for such scenario and gets terribly confused over
Thanks, will take a look.
GnuPG supports creating signatures consisting of multiple signature
packets. If such a signature is verified, it outputs all the status
messages for each signature separately. However, git currently does not
account for such scenario and gets terribly confused over getting
multiple *SIG
5 matches
Mail list logo