Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] decoupling a submodule's existence and its url

2017-03-14 Thread Brandon Williams
On 03/14, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Brandon Williams writes: > > > changes in v3: > > > > * Droped a patch which tried to use a more accurate URL for deinit. It > > didn't > > really fit inside the scope of this series. It may be something we want > > to > > revisit

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] decoupling a submodule's existence and its url

2017-03-14 Thread Junio C Hamano
Brandon Williams writes: > changes in v3: > > * Droped a patch which tried to use a more accurate URL for deinit. It didn't > really fit inside the scope of this series. It may be something we want to > revisit later though. > > * The --init-active flag now ensure that

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] decoupling a submodule's existence and its url

2017-03-13 Thread Stefan Beller
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > changes in v3: > > * Droped a patch which tried to use a more accurate URL for deinit. It didn't > really fit inside the scope of this series. It may be something we want to > revisit later though. > > * The

[PATCH v3 00/10] decoupling a submodule's existence and its url

2017-03-13 Thread Brandon Williams
changes in v3: * Droped a patch which tried to use a more accurate URL for deinit. It didn't really fit inside the scope of this series. It may be something we want to revisit later though. * The --init-active flag now ensure that all submodules which are configured to be 'active'