On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
Even if I share the the concerns that the cache may work on one system,
but not on the other, there should be better ways to protect from that.
Using the uname does not really help, if you move one repo from NTFS to
On 10.12.14 13:22, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
That opens another question:
How flexible/extensible/self-describing is the format of the UNTR extension
?
If we drop the OS name root dir check because it disallows network use,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de wrote:
That opens another question:
How flexible/extensible/self-describing is the format of the UNTR extension
?
If we drop the OS name root dir check because it disallows network use,
but later add a better method to
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:05:07PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
If the user enables untracked cache, then
- move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
- or simply upgrade OS
- or move the whole (portable) disk from one machine to another
- or access a shared fs from another
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:04 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:05:07PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
If the user enables untracked cache, then
- move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
- or simply upgrade OS
- or move the whole
On 12/09/2014 11:53 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:04 PM, brian m. carlson
sand...@crustytoothpaste.net wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:05:07PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
If the user enables untracked cache, then
- move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
- or
If the user enables untracked cache, then
- move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
- or simply upgrade OS
- or move the whole (portable) disk from one machine to another
- or access a shared fs from another machine
there's no guarantee that untracked cache can still function properly.
7 matches
Mail list logo
