Samuel Lijin writes:
>> /* And our single-liner comments look like this */
>>
>>> + for (i = 0; i < dir->nr; i++) {
>>> + if (!dir->entries[i])
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + for (j = i + 1; j < dir->nr; j++) {
>
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Samuel Lijin writes:
>
>> When we taught read_directory_recursive() to recurse into untracked
>> directories in search of ignored files given DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO, that
>> had the side effect of teaching it to collect the untracked contents
Samuel Lijin writes:
> When we taught read_directory_recursive() to recurse into untracked
> directories in search of ignored files given DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO, that
> had the side effect of teaching it to collect the untracked contents of
> untracked directories. It doesn't always make sense to r
When we taught read_directory_recursive() to recurse into untracked
directories in search of ignored files given DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO, that
had the side effect of teaching it to collect the untracked contents of
untracked directories. It doesn't always make sense to return these,
though (we do need
4 matches
Mail list logo
