Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> I get exactly the same thing as you do below when following these
> steps. So it seems your patch in
> 2122b01f-7627-cd1b-c7df-751c076f9...@web.de is just fine as-is and I
> just screwed something up when testing this.
>
> Sorry about the
Am 29.06.2017 um 00:21 schrieb René Scharfe:
$ git am
# pasted my email
Applying: coccinelle: add a rule to make "expression" code use FREE_AND_NULL()
# results in commit message with scissor line, interesting..
"git am --scissors" commits with the correct message. I'll do a
"git config
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:30 AM, René Scharfe wrote:
> Am 29.06.2017 um 00:21 schrieb René Scharfe:
>>
>> Am 28.06.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 25 2017, René Scharfe jotted:
>>>
Am 16.06.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>
Am 29.06.2017 um 00:21 schrieb René Scharfe:
Am 28.06.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
On Sun, Jun 25 2017, René Scharfe jotted:
Am 16.06.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
A follow-up to the existing "type" rule added
On Wed, Jun 28 2017, René Scharfe jotted:
> Am 28.06.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 25 2017, René Scharfe jotted:
>>
>>> Am 16.06.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> A follow-up to the
Am 28.06.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
>
> On Sun, Jun 25 2017, René Scharfe jotted:
>
>> Am 16.06.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>>>
A follow-up to the existing "type" rule added in an earlier
change. This
On Wed, Jun 28 2017, Junio C. Hamano jotted:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
>> Late reply, sorry. What version of coccinelle are you running? I have
>> 1.0.4 (from Debian) and can't get this to produce the same results as
>> what I have.
>>
>> On top of next, I did:
>>
>>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> Late reply, sorry. What version of coccinelle are you running? I have
> 1.0.4 (from Debian) and can't get this to produce the same results as
> what I have.
>
> On top of next, I did:
>
> Revert "*.[ch] refactoring: make use of the
On Sun, Jun 25 2017, René Scharfe jotted:
> Am 16.06.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>>
>>> A follow-up to the existing "type" rule added in an earlier
>>> change. This catches some occurrences that are missed by the previous
>>> rule.
Am 16.06.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
>> A follow-up to the existing "type" rule added in an earlier
>> change. This catches some occurrences that are missed by the previous
>> rule.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> A follow-up to the existing "type" rule added in an earlier
> change. This catches some occurrences that are missed by the previous
> rule.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> ---
Hmph, I wonder if the "type" thing
A follow-up to the existing "type" rule added in an earlier
change. This catches some occurrences that are missed by the previous
rule.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
---
contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git
12 matches
Mail list logo