On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:41:39AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> If we are open to writing anything, then I think it should follow the
> same pointer-to-data pattern that the rest of the struct does. I.e.,
> declare the extra pack-data struct as
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:41:39AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > The other nice thing about whence_only is that it flips the logic. So
> > any existing callers which depend on filling the union automatically
> > will not be affected (though I would be surprised if there are any such
> > callers
Jeff King writes:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:15:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > + if (!oi->typep && !oi->sizep && !oi->disk_sizep &&
>> > + !oi->delta_base_sha1 && !oi->typename && !oi->contentp &&
>> > + !oi->populate_u) {
>> > + oi->whence = OI_PACKED;
>> > +
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:15:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > + if (!oi->typep && !oi->sizep && !oi->disk_sizep &&
> > + !oi->delta_base_sha1 && !oi->typename && !oi->contentp &&
> > + !oi->populate_u) {
> > + oi->whence = OI_PACKED;
> > + return 0;
> > +
Jonathan Tan writes:
> Add an option to struct object_info to suppress population of additional
> information about a packed object if unneeded. This allows an
> optimization in which sha1_object_info_extended() does not even need to
> access the pack if no information besides provenance is reque
Add an option to struct object_info to suppress population of additional
information about a packed object if unneeded. This allows an
optimization in which sha1_object_info_extended() does not even need to
access the pack if no information besides provenance is requested. A
subsequent patch will m
6 matches
Mail list logo
