Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Partial clone part 2: fsck and promisors

2017-11-22 Thread Jonathan Tan
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Jonathan Tan wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:25:13 +0900 > Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Thanks, will replace/queue all three series. I am getting a feeling >> that the first one is already ready for 'next', while the

Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Partial clone part 2: fsck and promisors

2017-11-22 Thread Jonathan Tan
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:25:13 +0900 Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff Hostetler writes: > > > From: Jeff Hostetler > > > > This is V5 of part 2 of partial clone. This assumes V5 of part 1 > > is already present. V5 includes minor

Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Partial clone part 2: fsck and promisors

2017-11-21 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff Hostetler writes: > From: Jeff Hostetler > > This is V5 of part 2 of partial clone. This assumes V5 of part 1 > is already present. V5 includes minor cleanup over V4 and better > separates the --exclude-promisor-objects and --missing

[PATCH v5 00/10] Partial clone part 2: fsck and promisors

2017-11-21 Thread Jeff Hostetler
From: Jeff Hostetler This is V5 of part 2 of partial clone. This assumes V5 of part 1 is already present. V5 includes minor cleanup over V4 and better separates the --exclude-promisor-objects and --missing arguments. Part 2 is concerned with fsck, gc, initial support