On Wed, Nov 07 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:39:14PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 04 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:
>> > + {
>> > + "sha256",
>> > + /* "s256", big-endian */
>>
>> The existing entry/comment for sha1 is:
>>
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:39:14PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > + {
> > + "sha256",
> > + /* "s256", big-endian */
>
> The existing entry/comment for sha1 is:
>
> "sha1",
> /* "sha1",
On Sun, Nov 04 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:
> SHA-1 is weak and we need to transition to a new hash function. For
> some time, we have referred to this new function as NewHash. Recently,
> we decided to pick SHA-256 as NewHash. The reasons behind the choice of
> SHA-256 are outlined in the
SHA-1 is weak and we need to transition to a new hash function. For
some time, we have referred to this new function as NewHash. Recently,
we decided to pick SHA-256 as NewHash. The reasons behind the choice of
SHA-256 are outlined in the thread starting at [1] and in the commit
history for the
4 matches
Mail list logo