On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 06:35:40AM +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> > The subject says "clarify" so I was a little surprised to see code
> > changes. It looks like we're just avoiding reassigning on top of the
> > value repeatedly,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> The subject says "clarify" so I was a little surprised to see code
> changes. It looks like we're just avoiding reassigning on top of the
> value repeatedly, which is part of that clarification. It looks like a
> noop to me.
Oh
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 07:33:50AM +0100, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> While this field most of the time contains the canonical object size,
> there is one case it does not: when we have found that the base object
> of the delta in question is also to be packed, we will very happily
> reuse the
While this field most of the time contains the canonical object size,
there is one case it does not: when we have found that the base object
of the delta in question is also to be packed, we will very happily
reuse the delta by copying it over instead of regenerating the new
delta.
"size" in this
4 matches
Mail list logo