On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> That could be added in ws.c:ws_check_emit, as these certain words
>> are similar to coloring whitespace.
>
> I actually was envisioning of highlighting a part of a line, like
>
> -Very poor SCM
> +Very nic
Stefan Beller writes:
> That could be added in ws.c:ws_check_emit, as these certain words
> are similar to coloring whitespace.
I actually was envisioning of highlighting a part of a line, like
-Very poor SCM
+Very nice SCM
which would be done by finding semi-matching removed and added
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
+static void show_submodule_header(struct diff_options *o, const char
*path,
struct object_id *one, struct object_id *two,
unsigned dirty_submodule, const char *meta,
Stefan Beller writes:
>>> +static void show_submodule_header(struct diff_options *o, const char *path,
>>> struct object_id *one, struct object_id *two,
>>> unsigned dirty_submodule, const char *meta,
>>> const char *reset,
>> ...
>> How does capturing th
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> In a later patch, I want to propose an option to detect&color
>> moved lines in a diff, which cannot be done in a one-pass over
>> the diff. Instead we need to go over the whole diff twice,
>> because we cannot d
Stefan Beller writes:
> In a later patch, I want to propose an option to detect&color
> moved lines in a diff, which cannot be done in a one-pass over
> the diff. Instead we need to go over the whole diff twice,
> because we cannot detect the first line of the two corresponding
> lines (+ and -)
In a later patch, I want to propose an option to detect&color
moved lines in a diff, which cannot be done in a one-pass over
the diff. Instead we need to go over the whole diff twice,
because we cannot detect the first line of the two corresponding
lines (+ and -) that got moved.
So to prepare the
7 matches
Mail list logo
