On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>
>> Yes that seems reasonable.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jake
>
> I reviewed all your comments and you seem to be ok with including this
> series as
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> Yes that seems reasonable.
>
> Thanks,
> Jake
I reviewed all your comments and you seem to be ok with including this
series as it is queued currently?
Thanks,
Stefan
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> +
> + if (option_recursive) {
> +
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
+
+ if (option_recursive) {
+ if (option_required_reference.nr &&
+
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>> +
>>> + if (option_recursive) {
>>> + if (option_required_reference.nr &&
>>> + option_optional_reference.nr)
>>> + die(_("clone --recursive is not compatible
>> +
>> + if (option_recursive) {
>> + if (option_required_reference.nr &&
>> + option_optional_reference.nr)
>> + die(_("clone --recursive is not compatible with "
>> + "both --reference and
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> When `--recursive` and `--reference` is given, it is reasonable to
> expect that the submodules are created with references to the submodules
> of the given alternate for the superproject.
>
> An initial attempt to do
When `--recursive` and `--reference` is given, it is reasonable to
expect that the submodules are created with references to the submodules
of the given alternate for the superproject.
An initial attempt to do this was presented to the mailing list, which
used flags that are passed around
8 matches
Mail list logo