Re: [RFC/PATCH] branch: name detached HEAD analogous to status

2015-02-23 Thread Marc Branchaud
On 15-02-22 02:21 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Michael J Gruber g...@drmicha.warpmail.net writes: git status carefully names a detached HEAD at resp. from a rev or ref depending on whether the detached HEAD has moved since. git branch always uses from, which can be confusing, because a

Re: [RFC/PATCH] branch: name detached HEAD analogous to status

2015-02-23 Thread Marc Branchaud
On 15-02-22 12:38 PM, Michael J Gruber wrote: git status carefully names a detached HEAD at resp. from a rev or ref depending on whether the detached HEAD has moved since. git branch always uses from, which can be confusing, because a status-aware user would interpret this as moved detached

Re: [RFC/PATCH] branch: name detached HEAD analogous to status

2015-02-23 Thread Michael J Gruber
Marc Branchaud venit, vidit, dixit 23.02.2015 16:12: On 15-02-22 12:38 PM, Michael J Gruber wrote: git status carefully names a detached HEAD at resp. from a rev or ref depending on whether the detached HEAD has moved since. git branch always uses from, which can be confusing, because a

Re: [RFC/PATCH] branch: name detached HEAD analogous to status

2015-02-23 Thread Marc Branchaud
On 15-02-23 11:24 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: Marc Branchaud venit, vidit, dixit 23.02.2015 16:12: On 15-02-22 12:38 PM, Michael J Gruber wrote: git status carefully names a detached HEAD at resp. from a rev or ref depending on whether the detached HEAD has moved since. git branch always uses

Re: [RFC/PATCH] branch: name detached HEAD analogous to status

2015-02-23 Thread Michael J Gruber
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 22.02.2015 20:21: Michael J Gruber g...@drmicha.warpmail.net writes: git status carefully names a detached HEAD at resp. from a rev or ref depending on whether the detached HEAD has moved since. git branch always uses from, which can be confusing, because a

Re: [RFC/PATCH] branch: name detached HEAD analogous to status

2015-02-22 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael J Gruber g...@drmicha.warpmail.net writes: git status carefully names a detached HEAD at resp. from a rev or ref depending on whether the detached HEAD has moved since. git branch always uses from, which can be confusing, because a status-aware user would interpret this as moved

[RFC/PATCH] branch: name detached HEAD analogous to status

2015-02-22 Thread Michael J Gruber
git status carefully names a detached HEAD at resp. from a rev or ref depending on whether the detached HEAD has moved since. git branch always uses from, which can be confusing, because a status-aware user would interpret this as moved detached HEAD. Make git branch use the same logic and