When we send out pkt-lines with refnames, we use a static
1000-byte buffer. This means that the maximum size of a ref
over the git protocol is around 950 bytes (the exact size
depends on the protocol line being written, but figure on a sha1
plus some boilerplate).
This is enough for any sane
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:49:58PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
Another option would be to use a static strbuf. Then we're only wasting
heap, and even then only as much as we need (we'd still manually cap it
at LARGE_PACKET_MAX since that's what the protocol dictates). This would
also make
Am 09.12.2014 um 18:49 schrieb Jeff King:
+test_expect_success 'create repo with absurdly long refname' '
+ ref240=$_z40/$_z40/$_z40/$_z40/$_z40/$_z40
+ ref1440=$ref240/$ref240/$ref240/$ref240/$ref240/$ref240
+ git init long
+ (
+ cd long
+
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:58:26PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Am 09.12.2014 um 18:49 schrieb Jeff King:
+test_expect_success 'create repo with absurdly long refname' '
+ ref240=$_z40/$_z40/$_z40/$_z40/$_z40/$_z40
+ ref1440=$ref240/$ref240/$ref240/$ref240/$ref240/$ref240
+ git
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:49:58PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
Another option would be to use a static strbuf. Then we're only wasting
heap, and even then only as much as we need (we'd still manually cap it
at LARGE_PACKET_MAX since that's what the protocol
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:49:58PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
Another option would be to use a static strbuf. Then we're only wasting
heap, and even then only as much as we need (we'd still
6 matches
Mail list logo
