Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

(It looks like I did not reply to this other email yet, sorry about this late reply.) On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:54:34 +0200 > Christian Couder wrote: > >> Git can store its objects only in

Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

(It looks like I did not reply to this email yet, sorry about this late reply.) On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Ben Peart wrote: > > On 7/1/2017 3:41 PM, Christian Couder wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Ben Peart wrote: >>> >>> Great to see

Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:54:34 +0200 Christian Couder wrote: > Git can store its objects only in the form of loose objects in > separate files or packed objects in a pack file. > > To be able to better handle some kind of objects, for example big > blobs, it would be

Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

On 7/1/2017 3:41 PM, Christian Couder wrote: On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Ben Peart wrote: On 6/20/2017 3:54 AM, Christian Couder wrote: To be able to better handle some kind of objects, for example big blobs, it would be nice if Git could store its objects in

Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

Christian Couder writes: > On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Christian Couder writes: >> I think it would be good to ensure the interface is robust and performant enough to actually

Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Christian Couder writes: > >>> I think it would be good to ensure the >>> interface is robust and performant enough to actually replace the current >>> object store interface (even if we don't

Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

Christian Couder writes: >> I think it would be good to ensure the >> interface is robust and performant enough to actually replace the current >> object store interface (even if we don't actually do that just yet). > > I agree that it should be robust and performant,

Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Christian Couder wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Ben Peart wrote: >> The fact that "git clone is taught a --initial-refspec" option" indicates >> this isn't just an ODB implementation detail. Is there a

Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Ben Peart wrote: > > > On 6/20/2017 3:54 AM, Christian Couder wrote: >> To be able to better handle some kind of objects, for example big >> blobs, it would be nice if Git could store its objects in other object >> databases (ODB). >> >> To do

Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

On 6/20/2017 3:54 AM, Christian Couder wrote: Goal Git can store its objects only in the form of loose objects in separate files or packed objects in a pack file. To be able to better handle some kind of objects, for example big blobs, it would be nice if Git could store its objects in

Re: [RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Christian Couder wrote: > > Future work > ~~~ > > First sorry about the state of this patch series, it is not as clean > as I would have liked, butI think it is interesting to get feedback > from the mailing list at this point,

[RFC/PATCH v4 00/49] Add initial experimental external ODB support

Goal Git can store its objects only in the form of loose objects in separate files or packed objects in a pack file. To be able to better handle some kind of objects, for example big blobs, it would be nice if Git could store its objects in other object databases (ODB). To do that, this