Re: [RFC 0/2] explicitly support or not support --exclude-promisor-objects

2018-10-23 Thread Matthew DeVore
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: Thanks; both patches make sense. As the problematic feature appeared in 2.17.x track, I'll see if I can easily make it ready to be merged down to maint-2.17 track later when somebody wants to. Great. Thank you for the review.

Re: [RFC 0/2] explicitly support or not support --exclude-promisor-objects

2018-10-22 Thread Junio C Hamano
Matthew DeVore writes: > This patch set fixes incorrect parsing of the --exclude-promisor-objects > option that I found while working on: > > https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1539298957.git.matv...@google.com/ > Thanks; both patches make sense. As the problematic feature appeared in 2.17.

Re: [RFC 0/2] explicitly support or not support --exclude-promisor-objects

2018-10-22 Thread Matthew DeVore
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, Matthew DeVore wrote: This patch set fixes incorrect parsing of the --exclude-promisor-objects option that I found while working on: Somehow I sent two copies of every message in the patchset. I'm sorry for the mess.

[RFC 0/2] explicitly support or not support --exclude-promisor-objects

2018-10-22 Thread Matthew DeVore
This patch set fixes incorrect parsing of the --exclude-promisor-objects option that I found while working on: https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1539298957.git.matv...@google.com/ Thank you, Matthew DeVore (2): Documentation/git-log.txt: do not show --exclude-promisor-objects exclude-prom