On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:18:37 -0400
Ben Peart wrote:
> > But if there was a good way to refer to the "anti-projection" in a
> > virtualized system (that is, the "real" thing or "object" behind the
> > "virtual" thing or "image"), then maybe the "virtualized" language is
> >
On 8/17/2017 5:39 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
Thanks for your comments. I'll reply to both your e-mails in this one
e-mail.
This illustrates another place we need to resolve the
naming/vocabulary. We should at least be consistent to make it easier
to discuss/explain. We obviously went with
Thanks for your comments. I'll reply to both your e-mails in this one
e-mail.
> This illustrates another place we need to resolve the
> naming/vocabulary. We should at least be consistent to make it easier
> to discuss/explain. We obviously went with "virtual" when building
> GVFS but I'm OK
On 8/16/2017 5:35 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:32:23 -0700
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jonathan Tan writes:
Also, let me know if there's a better way to send out these patches for
review. Some of the code here has been reviewed
On 8/15/2017 8:32 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
This patch is based on an updated version of my refactoring of
pack-related functions [1].
This corresponds to patch 1 of my previous series [2]. I'm sending this
patch out (before I update the rest) for 2 reasons:
* to provide a demonstration of
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:32:23 -0700
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Tan writes:
>
> > Also, let me know if there's a better way to send out these patches for
> > review. Some of the code here has been reviewed before, for example.
> >
> > [1]
> >
Jonathan Tan writes:
> Also, let me know if there's a better way to send out these patches for
> review. Some of the code here has been reviewed before, for example.
>
> [1]
> https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1502241234.git.jonathanta...@google.com/
>
> [2]
>
This patch is based on an updated version of my refactoring of
pack-related functions [1].
This corresponds to patch 1 of my previous series [2]. I'm sending this
patch out (before I update the rest) for 2 reasons:
* to provide a demonstration of how the feature could be implemented,
in the
8 matches
Mail list logo