Re: [RFC PATCH] Updated "imported object" design

2017-08-18 Thread Jonathan Tan
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:18:37 -0400 Ben Peart wrote: > > But if there was a good way to refer to the "anti-projection" in a > > virtualized system (that is, the "real" thing or "object" behind the > > "virtual" thing or "image"), then maybe the "virtualized" language is > >

Re: [RFC PATCH] Updated "imported object" design

2017-08-18 Thread Ben Peart
On 8/17/2017 5:39 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote: Thanks for your comments. I'll reply to both your e-mails in this one e-mail. This illustrates another place we need to resolve the naming/vocabulary. We should at least be consistent to make it easier to discuss/explain. We obviously went with

Re: [RFC PATCH] Updated "imported object" design

2017-08-17 Thread Jonathan Tan
Thanks for your comments. I'll reply to both your e-mails in this one e-mail. > This illustrates another place we need to resolve the > naming/vocabulary. We should at least be consistent to make it easier > to discuss/explain. We obviously went with "virtual" when building > GVFS but I'm OK

Re: [RFC PATCH] Updated "imported object" design

2017-08-17 Thread Ben Peart
On 8/16/2017 5:35 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:32:23 -0700 Junio C Hamano wrote: Jonathan Tan writes: Also, let me know if there's a better way to send out these patches for review. Some of the code here has been reviewed

Re: [RFC PATCH] Updated "imported object" design

2017-08-17 Thread Ben Peart
On 8/15/2017 8:32 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote: This patch is based on an updated version of my refactoring of pack-related functions [1]. This corresponds to patch 1 of my previous series [2]. I'm sending this patch out (before I update the rest) for 2 reasons: * to provide a demonstration of

Re: [RFC PATCH] Updated "imported object" design

2017-08-16 Thread Jonathan Tan
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:32:23 -0700 Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Tan writes: > > > Also, let me know if there's a better way to send out these patches for > > review. Some of the code here has been reviewed before, for example. > > > > [1] > >

Re: [RFC PATCH] Updated "imported object" design

2017-08-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jonathan Tan writes: > Also, let me know if there's a better way to send out these patches for > review. Some of the code here has been reviewed before, for example. > > [1] > https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1502241234.git.jonathanta...@google.com/ > > [2] >

[RFC PATCH] Updated "imported object" design

2017-08-15 Thread Jonathan Tan
This patch is based on an updated version of my refactoring of pack-related functions [1]. This corresponds to patch 1 of my previous series [2]. I'm sending this patch out (before I update the rest) for 2 reasons: * to provide a demonstration of how the feature could be implemented, in the