On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:32:08AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 29 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:
>
> > SHA-1 is weak and we need to transition to a new hash function. For
> > some time, we have referred to this new function as NewHash.
> >
> > The selection criteria for
On 8/28/2018 8:58 PM, brian m. carlson wrote:
SHA-256 is somewhat slower to compute than SHA-1 in software. However,
since our default SHA-1 implementation is collision-detecting, a
reasonable cryptographic library implementation of SHA-256 will actually
be faster than SHA-256.
Nit: do you
On Wed, Aug 29 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:
> SHA-1 is weak and we need to transition to a new hash function. For
> some time, we have referred to this new function as NewHash.
>
> The selection criteria for NewHash specify that it should (a) be 256
> bits in length, (b) have high quality
SHA-1 is weak and we need to transition to a new hash function. For
some time, we have referred to this new function as NewHash.
The selection criteria for NewHash specify that it should (a) be 256
bits in length, (b) have high quality implementations available, (c)
should match Git's needs in
4 matches
Mail list logo