On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 11:32 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
>
> > I've tried to improve it, does the following paragraph sound clear
> > enough?
> >
> > branch: group related arguments of create_branch()
> >
> > New arguments were added to create_branch()
Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
> I've tried to improve it, does the following paragraph sound clear
> enough?
>
> branch: group related arguments of create_branch()
>
> New arguments were added to create_branch() whenever the need
> arised and they were added to tail of the argumen
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 11:06 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
>
> > From: Kaartic Sivaraam
> >
> > The ad-hoc patches to add new arguments to a function when needed
> > resulted in the related arguments not being close to each other.
> > This misleads the person reading th
Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
> From: Kaartic Sivaraam
>
> The ad-hoc patches to add new arguments to a function when needed
> resulted in the related arguments not being close to each other.
> This misleads the person reading the code to believe that there isn't
> much relation between those argumen
From: Kaartic Sivaraam
The ad-hoc patches to add new arguments to a function when needed
resulted in the related arguments not being close to each other.
This misleads the person reading the code to believe that there isn't
much relation between those arguments while it's not the case.
So, re-or
From: Kaartic Sivaraam
The ad-hoc patches to add new arguments to a function when needed
resulted in the related arguments not being close to each other.
This misleads the person reading the code to believe that there isn't
much relation between those arguments while it's not the case.
So, re-or
6 matches
Mail list logo
