Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] t0014: Introduce alias testing suite

2018-09-16 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:12 PM Tim Schumacher wrote: > This is the first multi-patch series that I submitted, so I'm unsure if I > should send the updated patch only or if I should send the complete series > again as v5. Any pointers to what the correct procedure for this case is would > be

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] t0014: Introduce alias testing suite

2018-09-14 Thread Tim Schumacher
On 08.09.18 01:38, Eric Sunshine wrote: On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:44 PM Tim Schumacher wrote: Introduce a testing suite that is dedicated to aliases. For now, check only if nested aliases work and if looping aliases are detected successfully. The looping aliases check for mixed execution is

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] t0014: Introduce alias testing suite

2018-09-07 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:44 PM Tim Schumacher wrote: > Introduce a testing suite that is dedicated to aliases. > For now, check only if nested aliases work and if looping > aliases are detected successfully. > > The looping aliases check for mixed execution is there but > expected to fail because

[RFC PATCH v4 3/3] t0014: Introduce alias testing suite

2018-09-07 Thread Tim Schumacher
Introduce a testing suite that is dedicated to aliases. For now, check only if nested aliases work and if looping aliases are detected successfully. The looping aliases check for mixed execution is there but expected to fail because there is no check in place yet. Signed-off-by: Tim Schumacher