Re: [RFH] limiting ref advertisements

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Jeff King wrote: > Thanks for responding to this. Glad to help (or more precisely annoy you somewhat :D) > I've been meaning to get back to it with > some code experiments, but they keep getting bumped down in priority. So > let me at least

Re: [RFH] limiting ref advertisements

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 06:46:21PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > > So it seems like left-anchoring the refspecs can never be fully correct. > > We can communicate "master" to the server, who can then look at every > > ref it would advertise and ask "could this be called master"? But it > > will be

Re: [RFH] limiting ref advertisements

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Jeff King wrote: > I'm looking into the oft-discussed idea of reducing the size of ref > advertisements by having the client say "these are the refs I'm > interested in". Let's set aside the protocol complexities for a > moment and imagine we

[RFH] limiting ref advertisements

I'm looking into the oft-discussed idea of reducing the size of ref advertisements by having the client say "these are the refs I'm interested in". Let's set aside the protocol complexities for a moment and imagine we magically have some way to communicate a set of patterns to the server. What