Michael J Gruber writes:
> Anton Wuerfel venit, vidit, dixit 07.03.2016 15:15:
>> Hello,
>>
>> as part of an university project we plan to implement time stamp
>> signatures according to RFC 3161. This enables users to create and verify
>> cryptographic time stamp signatures to prove that a comm
Anton Wuerfel venit, vidit, dixit 07.03.2016 15:15:
> Hello,
>
> as part of an university project we plan to implement time stamp
> signatures according to RFC 3161. This enables users to create and verify
> cryptographic time stamp signatures to prove that a commit existed at a
> certain point in
Hello Junio,
thanks for your reply. See my comments below.
"Junio C Hamano" writes:
> A few random thoughts that come to mind, none of which is
> rhetorical [*1*]:
>
> - What should happen when the timestamping service is unreachable?
>The user cannot get her work done at all? A tag is cr
"Anton Wuerfel" writes:
> as part of an university project we plan to implement time stamp
> signatures according to RFC 3161. This enables users to create and verify
> cryptographic time stamp signatures to prove that a commit existed at a
> certain point in time.
>
> As a long-term goal, we wou
Hello,
as part of an university project we plan to implement time stamp
signatures according to RFC 3161. This enables users to create and verify
cryptographic time stamp signatures to prove that a commit existed at a
certain point in time.
As a long-term goal, we would like to get this new featu
5 matches
Mail list logo